Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to DPOLens

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A remotely callable MCP server for US legal research that provides tools to search, retrieve, and analyze US case law from the CourtListener API, enabling agents to build evidence packs from primary sources without generating legal content.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Verifies legal citations by fetching the exact, in-force wording of cited articles from official PL and EU legal sources, preventing hallucination by returning verbatim text.
    2
    7
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to search a library of over 20,000 open legal skills by keyword, by meaning, or a hybrid of both, filtering by jurisdiction, language, practice area, or tag. It also returns facet counts for the collection and retrieves the full text of any selected skill.
    3
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides AI-powered access to the largest EU GDPR enforcement decisions database, enabling semantic search, GDPR article lookup, and enforcement statistics across all EU/EEA Data Protection Authorities.
    4
    36 PyPI
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables natural-language queries about US federal and New York privacy law obligations, returning citation-anchored answers with computed deadlines, usable from Claude Desktop or the command line.
    1
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    One-step legal compliance for vibe-coded apps: scans project, generates privacy policies/TOS, installs cookie consent banner, and checks EU AI Act risk.
    10
    127 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Scan any project or website for privacy compliance issues directly in your AI coding tool. Detects tracking tech, cookies, and third-party data collection. Works in Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
    3
    97 npm
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool has a distinct retrieval shape: query-based search, key-based clause read, document listing, and document outline read. The only near-pair is get_clause vs. get_document, but the descriptions explicitly disambiguate by stating one returns words and the other returns structure without text.

Naming Consistency5/5

All four tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (search_policies, get_clause, list_documents, get_document). The verbs match the operation type precisely, with no mixed conventions.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is well within a sensible range and each maps to a necessary step in a read-only legal-lookup workflow: discover documents, browse outline, search, and read a clause. Nothing feels padded or missing for the scope.

Completeness4/5

The read-only surface covers the core loop of search → locate → read clause, plus document/version discovery. Minor gaps remain: no way to request a specific historical version of a clause, and get_document only exposes top-level structure, forcing extra get_clause calls for deep article traversal.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive