disconnect_supabase_instance

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description discloses the behavioral effect (disconnection requiring reconnection). This adequately conveys the impact, though could mention error scenarios.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. The most critical information is front-loaded and concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless tool with no output schema, the description fully explains the action and its necessity for subsequent operations. No missing information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has no parameters, so the description is not required to add parameter information. The description correctly focuses on the action and context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Disconnect from the currently connected Supabase instance') and its consequence, distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'connect_to_supabase_instance'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the need to reconnect after disconnecting, providing context for when to use this tool. It lacks explicit when-not or alternative guidance, but the simplicity of the action makes it clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.