parliamentary-nlp-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to parliamentary-nlp-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for Brazilian Federal Senate open data (legislators, bills, votes, committees)3378 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies open-data API, enabling search and retrieval of federal legislative bills and their status.1542 PyPI1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for consulting Brazilian fiscal declaration data (SICONFI) from official sources. Provides a single read-only tool for users to query fiscal information through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides access to the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies open data API. It enables users to search for deputies, track their expenses, and query legislative information such as bills and API endpoints.61MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceContent moderation and profanity detection MCP server with 19 tools, 24 language support, leetspeak/Unicode obfuscation detection, context-aware analysis, batch processing, and user tracking for AI-powered content safety.21 npm60MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that compares Brazilian identity data (CPF, name, birth, address) and returns a similarity score against official records, enabling identity verification through natural language.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and covers the entire domain of auditing parliamentary speech.
The single tool name 'audit_parliamentary_speech' follows a clear verb_object pattern. Although there is only one example, the naming is consistent with common conventions.
The server has just one tool, which is on the thin end of the range. For a domain like parliamentary speech analysis, one might expect additional tools (e.g., for summarizing or extracting topics), but for the stated auditing purpose, a single tool can be acceptable.
The tool provides a comprehensive audit result including classification, confidence, entropy, and a human-review flag, covering all stated use cases (analyse, moderate, classify, safety-check). There are no obvious dead ends within the tool's intended scope.