Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to edgar-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching SEC EDGAR for companies, retrieving recent filings (e.g., 10-K, 10-Q), and accessing structured XBRL financial facts.
      12
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables deep analysis of SEC EDGAR filings through universal company search, document content extraction, and advanced filing search capabilities. Provides AI-ready access to business descriptions, risk factors, financial statements, and full-text search across any public company's SEC documents.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying of SEC EDGAR filings and financial data via natural language, offering tools for company lookup, filing retrieval, XBRL data, and full-text search.
      60
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to access SEC EDGAR data: search filings, extract sections, pull structured financials, and track insider transactions.
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Query SEC EDGAR for company filings, financial data, and executive disclosures. Search by company name or ticker, retrieve 10-K/10-Q/8-K filings, and extract structured financials — backed by the official SEC EDGAR API, built for AI agents.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables to search and retrieve SEC EDGAR filings, insider transactions, major shareholders, and executive compensation data through natural language.
      13
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are sharply distinct: one searches full-text across all filings, the other lists filings for a specific company. There is no overlap in purpose or likely misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: search_filings and list_company_filings. The convention is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is at the thin end of the range, but the server's stated scope of accessing EDGAR filings can reasonably be covered by search and list operations. It feels minimal rather than bloated.

    Completeness2/5

    The tools cover discovery (keyword search and per-company listing) but lack any retrieval tool to actually read a filing's content. Search results intentionally return metadata only, and without a fetch-filing tool, agents cannot access the underlying text, creating a dead end.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues