Google Scholar MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Google Scholar MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables academic research through Google Scholar by searching for papers, finding author publications, discovering recent research, and identifying highly cited works through web scraping with natural language queries.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables comprehensive academic research through the Semantic Scholar API, including paper search, author discovery, citation network analysis, and full-text access from arXiv and Wiley sources.42 npm29ISC
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to interact with Jupyter notebooks, perform semantic search over knowledge files, and manage research projects.334MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables academic research through the OpenAlex API, allowing users to search for papers, authors, and institutions, retrieve citations, and fetch full-text content when available. Perfect for building intelligent research assistants that can explore academic literature and related works.87MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and analyze Google Scholar publications, authors, citations, and download papers.112MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSearches and retrieves academic papers from open access sources like arXiv, Semantic Scholar, and PubMed, with full text access via arXiv PDFs, PubMed Central, and Unpaywall.2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Tools are mostly distinct with clear purposes. search_articles and search_open_access target different sources (Google Scholar vs. CORE), and ask_research_question synthesizes evidence, so overlap is minimal and well-explained.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., search_articles, get_citations), which is predictable and easy for agents to parse.
6 tools cover the core functionalities of a Google Scholar MCP server (search, citations, versions, full text, Q&A) without being excessive or insufficient.
The set covers essential workflows like searching, retrieving citations, versions, and full text. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no author-specific search or journal filtering), but overall it's well-scoped.