Skip to main content
Glama
alijahak

github-review-queue-mcp

by alijahak

Related Servers

Alternatives to github-review-queue-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that ranks and deduplicates your GitHub pull request review queue across direct requests, team requests, and your own waiting PRs into a single prioritized list via one get_review_queue tool.
      1
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with GitHub via a fine-grained personal access token — pushing commits, managing branches, opening and merging PRs, creating issues, and reading repositories. It runs locally with no telemetry and supports a read-only mode.
      15
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Hosted MCP server that enables AI code reviews on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket PR/MR URLs via a single tool (review_url_code), integrating with Cursor, Claude Code, Claude Desktop, and GitHub Copilot through OAuth or Bearer token authentication.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: listing the review queue, fetching one PR, its files, its CI checks, posting a comment, and submitting a review. There is no overlap or confusingly similar pair.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All six tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_*, get_*, comment_on_*, submit_*). The repeated pull_request stem reinforces the domain without creating ambiguity.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a focused PR review-queue workflow. Every tool earns its place with no redundancy or filler.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers the full review loop: find requests, inspect PR metadata/files/checks, comment, and submit a verdict. Minor gaps remain, such as reading existing conversation/thread replies or dismissing/updating a prior review, but no core workflow dead-ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues