Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Bruster

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A lightweight 30KB MCP browser automation server that uses raw Chrome DevTools Protocol to enable AI agents to browse the web, take screenshots, interact with elements, and capture live page events like console logs and network requests.
      26
      23 npm
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server for browser automation that gives AI agents navigate, screenshot, and extract tools via a single small binary, without needing Node.js or Playwright. It provides CDP-based browser control with efficient startup and resource usage.
      24
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Native macOS browser (SwiftUI + WKWebView) that exposes an MCP server in-process so AI agents can drive a real local browser with the user's existing logged-in sessions. ~40 tools (navigate, click, fill, screenshot, eval_js, network log, accessibility tree). Local-only with bearer-token auth.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      single-binary MCP server that gives AI agents a browser. 66 tools for navigation, form filling, data extraction, screenshots, and DOM diffing — built on pure Chrome DevTools Protocol.
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to control an anti-detection browser for navigation, interaction, search, extraction, downloads, multi-tab workflows, and persistent sessions. Supports stdio and HTTP transports for desktop or remote MCP clients.
      971 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 43 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions or resources, and descriptions help separate close pairs like snapshot/find and cookies/set_cookie. There is some overlap among low-level inspection tools (text, html, attr, rect, count), but boundaries are generally clear.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The set uses snake_case consistently but mixes verb commands (click, fill_form, wait_for) with bare noun getters (cookies, url, title, network, console, dialog). It remains readable and category-consistent, but it is not a predictable verb_noun pattern throughout.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 43 tools, the surface is heavy for a single browser automation server, exceeding the typical 3-15 well-scoped range. Many commands are useful, but several low-level inspection tools could reasonably be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: navigation, interaction, DOM inspection, screenshots, network, console, cookies, tabs, and window controls are all present. Gaps remain around iframe/frame switching and explicit download or request-interception handling, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues