A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceProvides conversational, actionable accessibility testing for AI agents, including auditing, prioritization, and code-level fixes.
22
14 npm
MIT
Accessibility MCP Server
by alii13
Related Servers
Alternatives to Accessibility MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables accessibility auditing of rendered pages with multi-engine evidence, human-in-the-loop review, and fix verification across agent sessions.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to test web accessibility by scanning URLs, detecting violations, and running focused audits on keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and WCAG criteria — all within the assistant's loop.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents and humans to share live mobile and desktop web sessions, measure contrast, touch targets, overflow, and theme issues, and receive precise selector-level findings as text. It also lets users pin notes and screenshots for the agent to read, supporting faster fixes for responsive UIs.268 npmMIT
axe MCP Serverofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to scan web pages for accessibility issues and get AI-powered remediation guidance using Axe DevTools for Web.9-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables an AI agent to drive live, URL-synced mobile and desktop browser sessions and receive measured accessibility findings as text — contrast ratios, undersized touch targets, overflow, clipped content, and light/dark theme drift — each tied to a specific selector instead of a screenshot guess. It also lets a human pin notes and frames in a shared panel that the agent can read back when hunting bugs.268 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 22 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: auditing, sessions, scoring, prioritization, explanations, comparisons, tracking, compliance, exports, filtering, aggregation, statistics, and dashboards. No overlapping functionality.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., audit_url, get_accessibility_score, generate_compliance_report). The verbs are descriptive and the pattern is uniform across all 22 tools.
Tool Count4/5
22 tools is slightly high but justified for a comprehensive accessibility auditing server covering the full workflow from auditing to reporting. Each tool serves a specific purpose without redundancy.
Completeness5/5
The tool set covers all major aspects: auditing (single/multiple), session management, scoring, prioritization, explanations, comparisons, historical tracking, compliance reports, multiple export formats, filtering/searching, aggregation, statistics, and dashboards. No obvious gaps for the intended purpose.
Maintenance
ActivityNo data
ResponsivenessSyncing