mc_getBatchOperation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as idempotency, rate limits, error conditions, or what happens if the batchId is invalid. The description only states the basic action without additional context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description 'Get batch operation details' is concise but not overly so. It is front-loaded and contains no wasted words, though it could benefit from slightly more detail within the same length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it does not indicate what 'details' includes, such as status or progress, leaving some ambiguity for an agent expecting more schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes the batchId parameter as 'The unique ID for the batch operation' with 100% coverage. The description adds no extra meaning, so it meets the baseline but provides no enhancement.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get batch operation details' clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'batch operation details', making the tool's purpose unambiguous. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like mc_listBatchOperations, which lists all batch operations, so it's not a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as mc_listBatchOperations or other get tools. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.