No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a distinct action: returning static framework content, a cash calculation, evidence tagging, and option ranking. The only mild overlap is that six_dimension_checklist supplies the dimensions and tiers that compare_options and grade_evidence consume, but the actions themselves are clearly separable.
Three of four names follow a clean verb_noun pattern (calculate_runway, grade_evidence, compare_options). six_dimension_checklist is a noun phrase for a retrieval tool, which is a readable and defensible deviation but breaks the otherwise uniform convention.
Four tools is a tight, well-scoped set for a single decision-analysis workflow with no redundant entries. It sits at the low end of the comfortable range, so the surface feels minimal rather than generous.
The core workflow (get framework, grade evidence, compute runway, rank options) is covered end to end. Gaps remain in persistence and synthesis: there is no tool to save a decision, retrieve prior assessments, or produce a final recommendation summary, though an agent can assemble those itself.
