Get current state

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description alone must convey safety and behavior. It correctly implies a read-only snapshot (non-destructive) and notes the requirement for a running dev instance. However, it does not disclose what happens if the instance is not running or any other side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single informative sentence, front-loaded with 'Snapshot'. The parenthetical adds necessary context. It is concise without missing key points, though it could be slightly more structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and low complexity, the description covers the tool's purpose and a crucial prerequisite. However, it does not outline what the snapshot contains beyond naming 'state machine and Pomodoro timer', leaving the output format unclear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter information, but none is needed since schema coverage is 100%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it provides a snapshot of the state machine and Pomodoro timer from a running dev instance. This specific verb+resource combination distinguishes it from siblings like get_state_history (history) and get_available_transitions (transitions).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions the prerequisite of having 'npm run tauri dev' running, implying the tool only works when a dev instance is active. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or provide alternatives like 'use get_state_history for past states'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.