A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceEnables MCP clients to manage Things 3 tasks locally on macOS, including searching, creating, editing, scheduling, moving, completing, and trashing tasks through supported automation interfaces.
20
13 npm
9
MIT
Things MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Things MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceComposite MCP server for Things 3 on macOS that bundles multiple read calls into single requests, enables batch writes, and provides a self-healing read path to handle TCC protection issues.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for Things 3 to retrieve completed tasks by date, weekly summaries, and project reports for analysis and reflection.13 npmISC
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI agents read/write access to your Things3 tasks via the Things API.321Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for Things 3 on macOS that enables AI assistants to create, read, update, and manage tasks and projects. It utilizes the Things URL scheme for write operations and AppleScript for querying data from the app.1513 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA CLI MCP server for Things 3, enabling programmatic access to todos and projects with filtering by due date.4Apache 2.0
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct operation: create, list, get, update, move, schedule, complete, and health. The boundaries between update (fields), move (container), and schedule (start date) are explicitly clarified in the descriptions, leaving no meaningful overlap.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools use the consistent 'things_' prefix and a verb_noun pattern (create_task, list_items, get_task, etc.). The only deviation is 'things_health', which lacks a verb, but it is still clearly readable and predictable.
Tool Count5/5
Eight tools is well-scoped for a task management server, covering the essential lifecycle operations without bloat. Each tool earns its place and the set feels complete for typical task workflows.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers create, read, update, move, schedule, complete, and health, which handles most task operations. However, there is no delete or reopen/uncomplete tool, and project/area creation is absent, which are minor but notable gaps in the lifecycle.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues