Ultra Debugger
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| analyze_js_fileC | Analyze a JavaScript file for potential issues using ESLint |
| analyze_multiple_js_filesC | Analyze multiple JavaScript files for potential issues |
| get_analysis_reportB | Get the detailed report from the last analysis operation |
| get_fix_suggestionsB | Get suggestions for fixing issues found in the last analysis operation |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The tools are mostly distinct, with clear separation between analysis operations and report/fix retrieval. However, 'analyze_js_file' and 'analyze_multiple_js_files' could potentially be confused as they serve very similar purposes, with the latter essentially being a batch version of the former. The descriptions help clarify this distinction.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case naming. The verbs 'analyze', 'get', and 'get' are appropriately used for their respective operations, creating a predictable and readable naming convention throughout the toolset.
With 4 tools, this is a well-scoped set for a debugging/analysis server. Each tool earns its place by covering distinct aspects of the workflow: file analysis, batch analysis, report retrieval, and fix suggestions. The count is appropriate for the apparent purpose.
The toolset covers analysis and reporting well but has notable gaps. There's no way to apply fixes automatically or manage analysis configurations. The domain suggests a debugging workflow, but without tools to implement suggestions or customize analysis rules, agents may hit dead ends after identifying issues.