F
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceEnables Claude to access and manage GitHub repositories dynamically at runtime, including private repos, with tools for browsing files, searching code, and viewing commits, pull requests, and issues.
11
1
-
r-coding-mcp
by alexseymer
Related Servers
Alternatives to r-coding-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to analyze GitHub repositories with tools for health scoring, contributor analysis, issue tracking, code search, and more.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides GitHub repository analysis tools for Claude, including repo summaries, commit history, issue tracking, contributor stats, and code quality assessment. Enables natural language queries about code quality, contributor activity, and repository comparisons.-
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI-powered automated testing, security scanning, code review, and maintenance tasks directly within Claude Code or desktop.124MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to inspect, analyze, and grade local Git repositories with tools for stats, TODO scanning, git history, large file detection, health scores, and tech stack fingerprinting.6MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables GitHub project management from Claude, supporting issue creation, milestones, labels, changelog generation, and repository stats.85 npm1MIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct target: detect_workflow (identify type), validate_file vs validate_project (different scopes of validation), get_practice vs list_practices (single vs collection), and generate_template. No two tools could reasonably be confused for one another.
Naming Consistency5/5
All six tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case convention (detect_workflow, validate_file, validate_project, get_practice, list_practices, generate_template). The pattern is predictable throughout with no deviations.
Tool Count5/5
Six tools is well-scoped for an R best-practices/validation server, with no redundancy. Each tool covers a distinct capability (detection, validation, practice lookup, template generation).
Completeness4/5
The surface covers the core lifecycle: detection, validation at file and project level, practice discovery, and template generation. Some gaps remain, such as auto-fix/remediation of findings, but the essential workflows are covered.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive