Skip to main content
Glama
alexpota

cloudscope-mcp

by alexpota
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to cloudscope-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Azure FinOps Elite

      mazhar480
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Production-grade MCP server for enterprise Azure cost optimization, enabling spend anomaly detection, multi-tenant auditing, budget validation, and compliance-aware recommendations.
      1
      MIT

    • nable (finops-mcp)

      getnable
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first FinOps MCP server. Ask about your AWS, Azure, GCP, and SaaS costs in plain English. Anomaly detection, rightsizing, idle-resource cleanup, and Jira/Linear ticketing. Credentials never leave your machine.
      10
      18
      Apache 2.0

    • Cost Management MCP

      knishioka
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for unified cost tracking and analysis across AWS, OpenAI, and Anthropic. It enables users to query expenditures, compare costs across providers, and analyze usage trends through natural language.
      10
      MIT

    • azure-cost-mcp

      MO2k4
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude live access to Azure pricing and cost data — retail prices, VM comparisons, reservation analysis, architecture estimates, and actual subscription spend.
      9
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct by their focus (cost summary, tag breakdown, cross-project, anomalies, etc.). A minor potential confusion exists between get_cost_summary and get_cost_by_tag, but descriptions clarify the grouping dimension.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority of tools follow a verb_noun pattern (check_, compare_, detect_, find_, get_, list_). The exception is 'top_spending_resources' which uses a less standard verb form, but overall the pattern is consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    15 tools is well-scoped for a cloud cost management server, covering summary, breakdowns, forecasts, anomalies, optimization, and utilities without being overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows are covered: cost review, forecast, anomalies, recommendations, and resource waste detection. Missing are write operations like budget creation or tagging, but the server appears read-only and covers its intended domain well.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources