Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-node-zig

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Turns any Linux server into an AI-agent-accessible machine over HTTPS, allowing MCP clients like ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok to securely control files, run shell commands, inspect system state, query SQLite, and work with git behind a bearer token.
      402 npm
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A secure and pluggable MCP server to run terminal commands on your local machine or cloud server — remotely, safely, and with LLMs or agentic clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for SSH and local terminal access. Supports interactive commands, long-running processes, and TUI apps like tmux/zellij
      6
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets you execute commands, manage files, run persistent shell sessions, transfer large files, and control background processes on remote machines via a lightweight HTTP agent, useful when SSH/WinRM/SMB are unavailable.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server and CLI for host and container operations, enabling Docker and Compose control, SSH, host inspection, logs, ZFS, and safe file transfer. It exposes flux and scout MCP tools with parity from the original TypeScript server.
      2
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The nine exec_* tools form a coherent session lifecycle (start/poll/wait/write/kill/close/list) with distinct roles, and the file tools (read_file/write_file/list_dir) are clearly separate. The main overlap is the trio exec vs exec_shell vs exec_start and the fact that exec_poll and exec_wait return identical payloads, which could cause occasional misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names are lowercase snake_case following a predictable verb_noun pattern. The exec_* family is systematically prefixed, and file tools (read_file/write_file/list_dir) and sys_info-adjacent tools follow consistent conventions throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the ideal range and each tool earns its place. The session lifecycle is broken into focused operations rather than being crammed into one overloaded tool, and the file/host operations round out the set without bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers process execution (one-shot, shell, and session-based), full file read/write/list, and host info, which is solid lifecycle coverage. Minor gaps remain (no file delete/stat/move/copy), but these are workaroundable via exec/exec_shell.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues