Skip to main content
Glama
alexcgodwin

OpsChugex LocalOps MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpsChugex LocalOps MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only observability of a Linux host via MCP, exposing allowlisted systemd, docker, nginx, logs, disk, and cert info without shell access.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables observation-only system inspection through MCP, exposing system identity, resources, process summary, and network summary without any mutation or command execution.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables stdio MCP clients to gather read-only diagnostics and incident evidence from Linux homelabs, including health, disks, services, Docker containers, logs, and confirmation-required remediation proposals.
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A secure, read-only MCP server for AI-powered system monitoring. It provides real-time OS metrics, config discovery, and safe log tailing to enable autonomous infrastructure audits without shell access risks.
      4
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for observing Linux hosts (systemd, ZFS, Docker, VMs, network, hardware, NixOS) as a graph of objects with provenance. Provides seven tools to list hosts, get status, collections, objects, evidence, lookup, and changes.
      1
      GPL 3.0

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources or actions, but the system health area has some overlap: system_health summarizes CPU, memory, and disk while cpu_status, memory_status, and disk_status provide detailed views of the same domains. Descriptions help distinguish them, but an agent could still hesitate between a summary tool and a detail tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case, which is consistent, but the conventions vary between noun phrases (system_info, cpu_status, network_interfaces) and verb-led names (list_processes, inspect_process, list_services). The pattern is readable but not uniform verb_noun throughout.

    Tool Count3/5

    23 tools sits in the 16-25 range that the rubric calls borderline heavy for a server's scope. While many tools serve distinct read-only inspection needs, several could be consolidated with the summary tools, making the surface feel somewhat expansive.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad for local read-only system inspection: hardware, OS, processes, services, software, users, security artifacts, startup, and scheduled tasks are all represented. Minor gaps exist, such as network connection/port inspection and event log access, but agents can work around most of these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues