Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-ipfs

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Shelby Protocol that enables AI agents to read, write, and manage files on decentralized storage (Aptos) through tools like upload, download, list, delete, and account info.
      5
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Ethereum Swarm decentralized storage. Provides 12 tools for uploading and downloading data and files, managing postage stamp batches, and working with Swarm feeds — all via the Bee API. Works with the public Swarm gateway or a local Bee node.
      7
      12 npm
      9
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Universal MCP server that wraps any CLI tool, enabling AI assistants to run commands via natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Rclone RC API. Gives AI assistants the ability to manage cloud storage remotes, copy/sync files, list directories, and more — all through natural language.
      56
      43 npm
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools have overlapping purposes that could cause confusion, such as w3_can_blob_add and w3_can_store_add both handling file storage with similar requirements, and w3_key_create and w3_up both generating key pairs. However, descriptions provide some clarity, and many tools target distinct resources like accounts, spaces, and uploads, reducing ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent w3_ prefix with snake_case and verb_noun patterns like w3_account_ls, w3_space_create, and w3_can_blob_add. Minor deviations exist, such as w3_up being less descriptive and some tools having vague names like w3_ls or w3_open, but overall naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 35 tools, the count is excessive for the apparent scope of IPFS and account management, making it heavy and potentially overwhelming. A more focused set of 10-20 tools would be more appropriate, as many tools like w3_can_index_add and w3_can_upload_rm are marked as advanced use, suggesting unnecessary complexity.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides comprehensive coverage for IPFS operations, including account management, file storage, space handling, and advanced features like CAR file management. Minor gaps exist, such as limited error handling tools or missing interactive commands like w3_space_create, but core workflows are well-supported with CRUD-like operations for blobs, stores, and uploads.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive