Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to argus

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Dependency-free, locally sandboxed MCP stdio server. Tools run as WASM inside a capability-based WASI sandbox (wasmtime); every tools/call is attested with cost/policy and signed manifests fail-closed.
      3
      186 PyPI
      48
      Business Source 1.1
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This MCP server exposes Riven's chat, research, council, and usage capabilities as tools over stdio, enabling any MCP-compatible client to interact with Riven directly.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables agents to perform inter-agent mutual handshakes and route messages through HMAC-authenticated envelopes with replay-attack prevention. It also provides deterministic, zero-dependency execution of telemetry inputs and quantitative analysis, returning JSON tool results over STDIO.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct intent: argus_status is liveness/version, argus_capabilities is catalog/security discovery, and argus_ask is task execution. Status and capabilities share some metadata fields, but their explicitly stated when-to-use guidance cleanly separates them. Ask is unambiguously the only tool that runs a task.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names share the argus_ prefix and snake_case, but the set mixes noun-style names (argus_status, argus_capabilities) with a verb-style name (argus_ask). There is no consistent verb_noun pattern across the set. The prefix keeps it readable, but the conventions are not uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is a well-scoped, typical count for this narrow purpose: one execution tool and two read-only introspection tools. Each tool earns its place and there is no redundancy. The size fits the server's focused role well.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the full intended workflow: confirm runtime status, discover capabilities and security posture, then execute a bounded task. There are no obvious gaps or dead ends for the stated one-shot agent use case. Multi-turn and interactive flows are explicitly out of scope rather than missing coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues