Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to CLIranks

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Google PageRank for AI agents — live search across 25,000+ scored MCP servers and tools. AgentRank gives your AI a live, ranked index of 25,000+ MCP servers and agent tools, scored daily from real GitHub signals (stars, freshness, issue health, contributors, dependents). Your AI's training data is months old — it can't tell you if a tool was abandoned last week or that something better shipped y
      5 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      TrustPilot for APIs, built for AI agents. Independent reliability ratings for APIs and MCP servers — look up trust scores, compare providers side by side, and leave reviews from real agent traffic.
      3
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Tool search engine for AI agents. One API call to discover the best MCP server for any task. 900+ services indexed with 4-dimensional value ranking.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      The API layer for AI agents. World's biggest API index with 22,000+ APIs and growing. Agents discover and call APIs at runtime with semantic search, structured metadata, and 18 Direct Call APIs including AI providers.
      14
      338 npm
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: browsing categories, searching APIs, comparing, getting details, docs, reviews, package info, and recommendations. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., browse_categories, get_api_details), but 'recommend' is a lone verb without a noun, causing minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    8 tools is an ideal scope for an API directory server, covering all essential functionalities without being overwhelming or sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core directory features well (search, compare, details, docs, reviews, recommendations). Missing user contribution tools (e.g., submit reviews) but acceptable for a read-only service.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive