Skip to main content
Glama
alexalexalex222

super-loop-mcp

by alexalexalex222
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to super-loop-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • super-loop-mcp

      alexalexalex222
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A referee for self-improving AI agent loops that mines past sessions for effective workflows, improves them, and requires measured proof before declaring anything better or done, never stopping until the user stops it.
      29
      MIT

    • Self-Learning MCP

      ByronAP
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to learn from their work by recording tasks, extracting patterns, detecting mistakes, and proactively surfacing insights, all using the agent's own model through a cooperative intelligence pattern.
      MIT

    • AYA MCP

      sztlink
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables creative software agents to operate within bounded, temporary workcells, handling scored objectives through autonomous inspect, execute, capture, and correct loops while producing evidence-backed receipts for human review.
      Apache 2.0

    • Hermes Squad

      BarnsL
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Multi-agent AI orchestrator that runs parallel coding agents in isolated sessions with self-improving intelligence, exposed via an MCP server for task execution and management.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, with clear descriptions. The only ambiguity is 'loop_next' being an alias of 'request_next_phase', which could cause confusion. Otherwise, tools like 'benchmark_propose', 'benchmark_run', and 'benchmark_select' are well-differentiated.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use lowercase and underscores, but the verb/noun order is inconsistent: some are verb_noun (e.g., 'run_campaign'), some are noun_verb (e.g., 'artifact_record'), and a few are noun_noun (e.g., 'loop_library'). Despite this, the names are still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 26 tools, the set is relatively large but appropriate for the complex domain of loop-based benchmarking and hypothesis testing. Each tool serves a specific function within the lifecycle, and no tools seem superfluous.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the entire workflow from initialization, loop management, benchmarking, hypothesis registration, testing, promotion, reporting, to saturation detection and campaign execution. Host detection and human review are also included, leaving no obvious gaps.

    Resources