Skip to main content
Glama
alex13slem

OpenProject MCP Server

by alex13slem

search_work_packages

Read-only

Search visible work packages by subject, filters, status, assignee, due date, with sorting and pagination for discovery or listing.

Instructions

Search visible work packages with focused fields plus optional native filters, sorting, and pagination. Use this for discovery or lists; use get_work_package for the complete resource once an ID is known and count_work_packages for totals only.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNoCase-insensitive subject text fragment
offsetNo
sortByNo
dueDateNoExact due date in YYYY-MM-DD format
filtersNo
pageSizeNo
statusIdNo
projectIdNo
assigneeIdNo
assignedToMeNoResolve the current user and filter by that assignee; cannot be combined with assigneeId
statusCategoryNoBroad status group; cannot be combined with statusId
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true; description adds minimal extra context (e.g., 'visible' work packages). No contradiction, but does not significantly extend beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no unnecessary words; front-loaded with function and then usage guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately outlines purpose and guidance, but lacks details on return format, pagination behavior, or filter semantics, especially given 11 parameters and no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 36% (4 of 11 parameters described). The tool description adds no parameter-level detail, failing to compensate for low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Search' and resource 'visible work packages', and differentiates from sibling tools 'get_work_package' and 'count_work_packages'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly provides when to use this tool ('discovery or lists') and when not to, naming alternative tools for specific needs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/alex13slem/openproject-codex-plugin'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server