Archicad-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Archicad-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets Claude manage an ISO 19650 / TCVN 14177 Common Data Environment on Autodesk Construction Cloud — projects, CDE folder trees, permissions, files, document status and naming compliance.45MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server to control Autodesk Navisworks Manage 2025 from Claude via natural language, enabling model inspection, property search, selection sets, and clash detection.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server giving Claude access to Trimble Connect, with 40 tools for projects, folder trees, files, versions, members, groups, and permissions via the Core API v2.40MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets users query, validate, convert, and compare IFC/BIM files using natural language. Runs fully locally and integrates with AI agents like Claude.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Archicad automation, enabling AI assistants to run Python scripts against running Archicad instances via the Tapir JSON API for complex workflows.45MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for AI-assisted project development and tracking. It exposes a typed graph of design nodes (concepts, decisions, requirements, etc.) and edges to Claude Code, enabling structured management of project knowledge and report generation.3Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 36 tools
Most tools are scoped to distinct resources, but there is real overlap: the generic execute_read/write_api_command tools can perform many of the same operations as the dedicated read/write tools, and audit_delivery_readiness, verify_ifc_export_readiness, and run_rule all execute QA rules. Descriptions clarify the intended use, but an agent still has to choose among overlapping paths.
The set overwhelmingly follows a snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_element_data, list_issues, edit_schedule_scheme, execute_write_api_command). It is slightly inconsistent because publish is a bare verb, read_schedule_scheme uses read instead of the more common get, and a few names are multi-word phrases like create_issues_from_failures.
36 tools is well above the 25+ threshold and will be heavy for an agent to navigate in every context. The broad Archicad domain explains the variety, but the set could be consolidated: QA readiness checks, issue actions, schedule operations, and the generic API command tools all form clusters that could be trimmed or merged.
The surface covers the main Archicad workflows: element lifecycle, selections, Teamwork reservations, QA rules, issues/BCF, schedules, and a generic API escape hatch. Minor gaps exist, notably updating/closing issues and a dedicated live schedule-scheme enumerator, but the execute_* tools and existing schedule file tools provide workarounds.