Skip to main content
Glama
alekskram

hyperliquid-agent-gateway

Related Servers

Alternatives to hyperliquid-agent-gateway

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only access to Hyperliquid's public market, user, vault, and staking data via 61 MCP tools, covering perpetuals, spot, and borrow-lend information.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only access to Hyperdash market intelligence for Hyperliquid, including per-asset price changes, trader performance and positions, liquidations, open interest, news, and TWAP orders via 28 MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only Hyperliquid and cross-exchange market research for AI agents, providing structured tools for live market data without requiring authentication.
      9
      35 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only Model Context Protocol server for Hyperliquid that exposes over 30 tools to query public market data and user state via the Hyperliquid Info API, without requiring a private key.
      41
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze Hyperliquid accounts by retrieving positions, PnL, fills, open orders, and funding through an x402 micropayment MCP server, with no API key or signup required.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for querying Hyperliquid perp markets, funding rates, order books, candles, and account positions/fills/funding for any address, without needing API keys or wallets.
      8
      43 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct data category or resource: market data, funding analytics, account risk, wallet balances, and transfers all have clear owners. Even the two funding-related tools differ obviously by single-coin history versus cross-perp screening.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names are lowercase snake_case noun phrases that directly describe their output, such as funding_carry_screener, market_overview, and token_transfers. There are no mixed conventions or vague generic verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well-scoped for a Hyperliquid data/risk gateway. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct part of the domain without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-side surface is nearly complete for an analytics-focused gateway: market data, account risk, funding, wallet balances, and transfer events are all covered. Minor gaps include no direct open-orders view and no native ETH transfer history, but these are workable and order execution appears outside the server's apparent scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues