sdcvalidatorofficial
A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceMCP server for validating SDC4 XML instances against XSD schemas, with two-tier error classification and SDC4 compliance checks.
1
Apache 2.0
vastlint
by aleksUIX
Related Servers
Alternatives to vastlint
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for validating JSON against schemas, checking email deliverability, verifying URLs, assessing data quality, and validating API responses using RFC-compliant checks and heuristic analysis.4 npm65 PyPIMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides code validation rules and analysis for various stacks/frameworks, enabling automated code reviews and reporting directly from VS Code and other editors.-
dashboardbaseofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that validates dashboardbase setup files and widget endpoint responses against the dashboardbase JSON contract, reporting errors and warnings before deployment.238 npmMIT- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceMCP server for creating and validating Twilio IVR scenario JSON, grammar files, and FAQ workbooks locally, with built-in specifications and patterns from production data.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for comparing JSON, XML, XLSX, CSV, and text data using expected templates, returning pass/fail with difference details.8 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to validate MCP servers, skills, extensions, and packages for schema, security, functional, and semantic quality directly from their MCP client.-
TDQS
A4.5/5.0
Scored across 7 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: validate raw XML vs. validate fetched URL vs. inspect wrapper chain vs. fix vs. rule listing/detail vs. capability discovery. Even the two URL-fetching tools differ in intent—one validates, the other provides structured creative analysis—and their names make the distinction clear.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: inspect_vast, explain_rule, fix_vast, get_adcp_capabilities, list_rules, validate_vast, validate_vast_url. The verbs are precise and the objects are consistently named, creating a predictable and intuitive surface.
Tool Count5/5
Seven tools is well-scoped for a VAST validation and fixing server. Each tool fills a necessary role: validation (raw and URL), inspection, fixing, rule reference, rule detail, and protocol capability discovery, with no redundancy or bloat.
Completeness5/5
The tool surface covers the full validation workflow: validate input, understand issues, look up rules, fix issues, and re-validate, plus deep inspection of wrapper chains for debugging. Supporting VMAP/DAAST and including AdCP capabilities discovery rounds out the domain without obvious dead ends.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week