Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
codecheck

codecheck

by aleks-fw
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to codecheck

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Aiqaramba

      alex-ai-eu
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Browser-based QA testing for AI-built software. Agents open real browsers (via Selenium), navigate pages, fill forms, click buttons, and report findings. Two modes: targeted tests (30-90s) and full-site discovery scans (3-15min).
      -

    • Webby MCP Server

      cordlesssteve
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive website validation across performance, accessibility, SEO, and security dimensions using multiple testing services including WebPageTest, Google PageSpeed Insights, Axe DevTools, Mozilla Observatory, and SSL Labs. Enables automated website health assessments through browser automation and API integrations.
      2
      12
      3 npm
      1
      -

    • ceramic-doctor

      The-Utopia-Studio
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to review Ceramic and ordinary websites with desktop/mobile browser QA, deterministic design and accessibility checks, optional visual judgement, and repeatable fix verification backed by preserved screenshots and reports.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    full_qa overlaps heavily with the individual test_* tools and quick_security, since it bundles the same checks. audit_project also subsumes most of these checks, making it unclear when to use the broad tools versus the granular ones.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The test_* tools follow a consistent pattern, but full_qa, quick_security, audit_project, and compare_reports break it. The mix of adjective_noun, verb_noun, and test_* styles creates a somewhat inconsistent naming scheme.

    Tool Count4/5

    8 tools is a reasonable count for a QA/audit server. However, full_qa and audit_project duplicate much of the test_* suite, so the same functionality could be consolidated slightly.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers interactions, layout, fonts, images, security, full audits, and report comparison, forming a solid QA workflow. Minor gaps like dedicated performance or SEO checks exist, but they are not essential to the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources