Skip to main content
Glama
albinjal

multi-agent-debate-mcp

by albinjal

multiagentdebate

Facilitate structured multi-agent debates with arguments, rebuttals, and judgments across multiple rounds to enable diverse AI personas to engage in formal debate and collaborative problem-solving.

Instructions

Structured multi‑persona debate tool.

Call sequence (typical):

  1. Each persona registers once with action:"register".

  2. Personas alternate action:"argue" (fresh point) or "rebut" (counter a targetAgentId).

  3. A special persona (or either side) issues action:"judge" with a verdict text (first line should be "pro", "con", or "inconclusive").

  4. Set needsMoreRounds:false only when the debate is finished and a verdict stands.

Parameters:

  • agentId (string) : "pro", "con", "judge", or any custom ID

  • round (int ≥1) : Debate round number

  • action (string) : "register" | "argue" | "rebut" | "judge"

  • content (string, optional) : Argument text or verdict

  • targetAgentId (string opt.) : Agent being rebutted (only for action:"rebut")

  • needsMoreRounds (boolean) : True if additional debate rounds desired

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
agentIdYes
roundYes
actionYes
contentNo
targetAgentIdNo
needsMoreRoundsYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It explains the protocol and verdict format, but does not explicitly disclose state management, side effects, or error behavior, which are relevant for such a tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with numbered steps and a parameter list, making it easy to follow. It is appropriately detailed, though slightly lengthy; could be condensed without losing clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity and the absence of an output schema, the description covers the essential protocol and parameter semantics. It does not detail return values or error handling, but the sequence and usage are sufficiently explained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description fully compensates by listing each parameter with explanations, including the enum values for action, the meaning of content and targetAgentId, and the role of needsMoreRounds.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose as a 'Structured multi-persona debate tool' and explains the call sequence with specific actions, making it distinct even without siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a typical call sequence (steps 1-4) and explains when to use each action (register, argue, rebut, judge) and when to set needsMoreRounds to false. However, it lacks explicit when-not-to-use guidance or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/albinjal/multi-agent-debate-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server