Skip to main content
Glama
alberthild

ShieldAPI MCP

by alberthild
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to ShieldAPI MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • lol

      al3al3al333
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      53 security & enrichment MCP tools for AI agents. Contract scanning, threat intel, OSINT, crypto data, DNS/WAF recon. Pay-per-call via HTTP 402 + USDC on Base mainnet. No API keys. First call free.
      -

    • OceanAlt AML (archived, moved)

      OceanAlt
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Archived and no longer maintained. Tools and prices shown here are out of date. Use the maintained server: glama.ai/mcp/servers/OceanAlt666/oceanalt-aml-mcp (GitHub: OceanAlt666/oceanalt-aml-mcp).
      314 npm
      MIT

    • chainverdict

      alexanderbalieu-connections
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Pay-per-call checks an AI agent runs before it moves money: token safety verdicts and wallet risk profiles on Base, on-chain payment verification, IBAN/VAT/BIC/LEI/ISIN validation, and live TLS and email-spoofing posture for a domain. Paid in USDC over x402 with no API key or account; the free payment_info tool explains the pricing.
      MIT
    • relayshield-mcp by relayshield

      relayshield-mcpofficial

      relayshield
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Security intelligence for AI agents — breach detection, SIM swap, domain lookalikes, OAuth watchlist, and malware scanning. Subscription or x402 PAYG.
      11
      MIT
    • Cybercentry MCP Server by Cybercentry

      Cybercentry MCP Serverofficial

      Cybercentry
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform pay-per-call security verification of wallets, tokens, contracts, dApps, agents, and more via a remote endpoint with no installation.
      2
      MIT

    • dyoe-agent-tools-mcp

      bjyoe2016
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Trust layer for AI agents: 22 pay-per-call x402 tools for scam and fraud checks, payment pre-flight, wallet screening, policy approvals, contact extraction and company research. Free preview with no wallet; paid calls settle in USDC on Base.
      22
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific security checks: domain, email, IP, password, prompt, URL, full scan, and skill scanning. The descriptions are detailed and non-overlapping, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool. For example, check_password and check_password_range are distinct in handling full hashes versus hash prefixes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with the prefix 'shieldapi.' and use snake_case throughout (e.g., check_domain, check_email, check_ip). This predictability aids in tool discovery and usage. The naming is uniform across all nine tools without any deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for a security-focused server, covering diverse checks from domain reputation to AI skill scanning. Each tool earns its place by addressing a specific security need, avoiding redundancy. The count is typical for such a domain, neither too sparse nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is highly complete for security scanning, covering key areas like domain, email, IP, password, URL, prompt injection, and AI skills. A minor gap is the lack of tools for remediation or mitigation actions (e.g., blocking threats), but the server's purpose appears focused on detection and analysis, which is well-covered. Agents can work around this by using results for decision-making.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources