Skip to main content
Glama
akshayadeodiaspark

luxare-retail-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to luxare-retail-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that integrates with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, enabling querying of customers, items, and sales orders through natural language commands in Claude Desktop.
      10
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides seamless integration with Claude Desktop for querying and managing timeseries data in GigAPI Timeseries Lake.
      7
      6
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects Claude to Teradata GCFR operational reporting, enabling natural-language queries about stream status, process history, loads, transforms, errors, SLA, and data lineage without writing SQL.
      21
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bowimi field sales CRM, enabling Claude to query routes, locations, contacts, orders, and products.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct domain: inventory, customers, and sales. There is no overlap in purpose or output, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use snake_case and are readable, but the pattern is not uniform: inventory_search is noun_verb, list_customers is verb_noun, and sales_history_report is a compound noun. Minor inconsistency but still clear.

    Tool Count3/5

    Three tools is at the lower end of the typical range. For a server focused on running specific reports from Diaspark, the count is acceptable but feels thin, potentially limiting agent capabilities.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover key reporting domains (inventory, customers, sales) but lack write operations or drill-down details. As a read-only reporting surface, it is adequate, but gaps exist for full retail lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues