enable_speed_limit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It adds one useful behavior ('auto-wakes if asleep') but does not disclose command-specific details such as required permissions, reversibility, failure modes, or effects on the vehicle beyond enabling the mode.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and front-loaded, using a single phrase to convey both the action and a key behavioral note. No wasteful filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no annotations, and four parameters, the description is too sparse to provide full context. It does not explain what happens on success/failure, how parameters interact, or what the agent should expect after invoking the command.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning to parameters like limit_mph or max_attempts; all useful semantics are already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Enables' with specific resource 'Speed Limit Mode', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools such as disable_speed_limit and other enable_* tools. Even without details, the exact function is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like disable_speed_limit or other limit-setting commands. The description does not mention parameters or preconditions, leaving the selection decision solely to the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.