Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to CiteNexus MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and LLM tools to verify academic citations against real literature, detect hallucinated references, retrieve authoritative metadata and DOIs, generate BibTeX/APA/IEEE citations, and search over 200M+ scientific publications via MCP tools.
      3
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for searching Google Scholar, enabling paper search, author lookup, citation tracking, and BibTeX export for AI assistants and automation workflows.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve academic papers, author profiles, and citation data from the Scopus database via MCP tools.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions such as searching, resolving, exporting, verifying, and enriching citations. Overlaps exist between get-citation and resolve-paper for identifier resolution, and between find-scholar-id and search-papers for discovery, but the descriptions provide enough distinction to guide selection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use kebab-case consistently, which is the dominant convention here. Most follow a verb_noun pattern (find-open-access, resolve-paper, verify-citation), while a few are noun phrases (paper-metrics, related-papers), creating minor deviation but still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for a scholarly citation and metadata server. Each tool covers a meaningful operation such as search, resolve, export, verify, metrics, or provider listing, without excessive surface area.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers discovery, identifier resolution, citation export, verification, open-access lookup, metrics, and related-paper traversal. Minor gaps remain, such as no dedicated full-text retrieval or citation-style configuration beyond BibTeX, RIS, and CSL-JSON, but core workflows are well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues