resume_vm

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description states the action (resume) and a prerequisite (env var), but adds no further behavioral detail beyond what annotations imply. Annotations already indicate it's not read-only, not destructive, etc., so the description is adequate but not enhanced.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of one clear sentence and a requirement note. Every word adds value with no unnecessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and the clear annotations, the description is fairly complete. It lacks discussion of error states or what happens if the VM is not suspended, but overall it's sufficient for a straightforward resume operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema provides 100% coverage with clear descriptions for 'node' and 'vmid'. The description does not add any additional semantic value beyond the schema, so it meets the baseline but does not improve understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description explicitly states 'Resume a suspended VM' with a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from siblings like suspend_vm or start_vm.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions a required environment variable for use, but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The context clarifies its role among siblings, but the description itself lacks usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.