Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to phoenix-mcp-eval

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Phoenix MCP Server is an implementation of the Model Context Protocol for the Arize Phoenix platform. It provides a unified interface to Phoenix's capabilites. You can use Phoenix MCP Server for: Prompts Management: Create, list, update, and iterate on prompts Datasets: Explore datasets, and synte
    27
    1,374 npm
    11,674
    Apache 2.0

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server that gives AI agents access to your application's OpenTelemetry traces for querying, analysis, and debugging.
    5
    16 npm
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides cost and reliability observability for LLM and agent workflows. It records model calls and allows querying and aggregating telemetry data through MCP tools.
    6
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that enables AI agents to run a deterministic orchestration loop with decomposition, subagent execution, and review feedback across multiple LLM backends.
    61
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Comprehensive MCP server for Langfuse, enabling AI assistants to access and manage traces, observations, scores, datasets, and sessions for observability.
    24
    14 npm
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 8 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: list vs get vs query operations are separated, and each targets a different entity (datasets, evaluations, traces, spans, projects). The main potential confusion is between get_traces and query_traces, though descriptions clarify query_traces as a structured filtering alternative.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow the verb_noun pattern consistently: get_ for single entities, list_ for collections, and query_ for the structured trace query. No style mixing or vague verbs; the naming is predictable and uniform.

Tool Count5/5

Eight tools provide a focused and well-scoped surface for a Phoenix evaluation/tracing server. Each tool addresses a distinct need without redundancy or bloat, fitting squarely in the ideal range.

Completeness4/5

The server covers the core read-only interactions with datasets, evaluations, traces, spans, and projects, including both list and detail views. Notable gaps include no tool to fetch a specific evaluation run's detailed results or a specific project's configuration, but these are minor for a query-focused eval server.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues