energy-emissions-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to energy-emissions-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI agents with structured access to U.S. EPA environmental data including nearby regulated facilities, chemical releases, water violations, and hazardous waste sites for any U.S. location. Enables comprehensive environmental impact analysis through the EPA Envirofacts API with geocoding support and distance-based filtering.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides natural language access to environmental data including air quality measurements, greenhouse gas emissions, and facility records. It enables users to perform geographic searches, trend analysis, and proximity-based queries using data from sources like OpenAQ and Climate TRACE.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceWraps the EPA Envirofacts REST API to provide access to emissions data without authentication.408 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceOpen corporate carbon emissions data for AI agents. Search companies and retrieve Scope 1, 2 and 3 disclosure history, Mycelium and Transparency scores, and per-scope figures with reported-vs-estimated provenance on every line.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceWraps EPA ECHO Web Services (free, no auth) to enable querying environmental data via natural language.231 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search U.S. hydraulic fracturing disclosure records — well-level frac job details (operator, API number, location, dates, base fluid volumes) and the disclosed chemical additives per job — by state, county, operator, or API number, plus lookups of where a given chemical has been used by CAS number. Responses include source, license, and coverage-window metadata so callers can distinguish missing data from out-of-window disclosures.21 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of misselection between tools. Its description also clearly delimits scope (GHGRP facility-level emitters, not a place's total emissions footprint), preventing misuse.
The single name `get_facility_emissions` follows a clean verb_noun snake_case convention that would scale predictably. With only one tool there is no cross-tool consistency to verify, so it falls short of a perfect score.
One tool is very thin for a whole emissions data server; there is no way to discover valid states/counties/years or drill into a specific facility. The single endpoint is well-scoped for its narrow query, but the surface is minimal for the apparent domain.
The core query (facility emissions by state/county/year) is well covered, including sorting, limits, totals, and citation metadata. However, notable gaps remain: no discovery of valid states/counties/years, no facility-level detail lookup, and no comparison or trend operations.