Skip to main content
Glama
akashpersetti

mcp-second-opinion

by akashpersetti
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-second-opinion

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • AI Consultant MCP Server

      GoldenPathAI
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to consult with multiple AI models (GPT, Gemini, Grok, etc.) through OpenRouter with intelligent auto-selection, conversation history, and caching. Allows your AI assistant to seek expert opinions from specialized models for different tasks like coding, analysis, or general questions.
      2
      4 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Model Council

      Totti0135
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that seats multiple LLMs as a council, letting your assistant query them in parallel or in sequence, relay answers for cross-critique, and merge conclusions within one conversation.
      6
      72 PyPI
      2
      MIT

    • council

      komsamoilenko
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Lets your AI assistant consult assistants from other vendors under your own subscriptions, track costs, and cross-examine answers across models to surface disagreements and open points.
      2 npm
      MIT

    • MCP AI Gateway

      kinhunt
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to intelligently select and switch between different AI models (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) within the same conversation based on task requirements. Provides a unified interface for accessing multiple AI providers through a single MCP tool.
      1
      22 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clear boundaries: ask_other_model queries a single rival LLM, while ask_the_panel convenes all enabled LLMs in parallel. There is no meaningful overlap between the two modes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent 'ask_<target>' pattern with distinct nouns. This makes the tool set predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count4/5

    Two tools is on the thin side, but it exactly matches the server's stated purpose: get a single second opinion or a panel opinion. Each tool earns its place with no redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The core use cases of requesting a single rival model or all enabled models are fully covered. A minor gap is the absence of a way to select a specific subset of models, but that may be configuration-level rather than tool-level.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources