Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to rugshield-402

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents on Base to call a check_token_risk tool before trading, providing honeypot detection, LP-lock verification, brand impersonation checks, and live sell simulation across Uniswap V2/V3/V4 and Aerodrome with a clear risk score and should-trade decision.
      1
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Rug pull risk scores and on-chain forensics for memecoins on Solana, Ethereum, Base and Robinhood Chain - launch-bundle detection, funding-origin tracing, deployer history, insider networks and whale flow. 15 read-only tools.
      15
      32 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Smart contract security scanner for Base. Detect honeypots, rug pulls, hidden mints, proxy dangers, and generate audit reports.
      8
      25 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Pre-trade token safety check for AI agents. Simulates a sell before you buy, then reports honeypot, tax, liquidity, pair age, same-ticker impersonation and owner powers as one low/medium/high/unknown verdict. Fail-closed: when a critical check cannot run it answers unknown rather than guessing low. Publishes its own measured error rate with the benchmark harness in the repo.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants and trading bots to verify smart contracts, test honeypot traps, assess DEX liquidity, and check wallet counterparty risk before deploying or trading capital on Base. It exposes preflight clearance, token audits, KYA reputation, and web-scraping tools with free and paid x402 tiers.
      7
      524 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The mandatory pre_swap_scan claims to detect honeypots, malicious taxes, and liquidity drains, which are exactly the purposes of check_honeypot and analyze_liquidity, creating unclear boundaries and likely misselection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Two tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (check_honeypot, analyze_liquidity), but rugshield_pre_swap_scan breaks consistency with a server prefix and adjective_noun structure, though all use snake_case.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools for a focused pre-swap safety scanner on Base is well-scoped; each tool addresses a distinct risk area, though the redundancy suggests possible consolidation.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers honeypot/tax simulation and liquidity depth, key pre-swap risks, but lacks checks for other contract risks like mintability or ownership privileges; minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive