Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Fida

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local CLI and MCP server that redacts secrets from logs, files, and diffs before sending them to AI agents, with stable placeholders and token-budgeted truncation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP gateway that reduces context overhead in coding-agent sessions by exposing only relevant tools and enforcing task-appropriate engineering gates, with privacy-first defaults and no network calls until explicitly enabled.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP safety layer that blocks dangerous files and redacts secrets before AI agents can access them, ensuring safe vibe coding.
      7 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets AI coding agents read project documentation and secret metadata, then use credentials by injecting them into child processes while redacting the values from all output. Agents can deploy, migrate databases, or SSH using real secrets without the values ever entering their context, transcripts, or logs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that lets AI agents use gated APIs without holding keys, enforcing declarative policies, injecting secrets server-side, and auditing access without content.
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: fida_read handles file reads, fida_shell handles command execution. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent pattern: 'fida_' prefix + verb (read, shell). This is a predictable and uniform naming convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is very minimal. While it may cover essential file read and shell execution, it feels thin for a security policy tool that could include more operations.

    Completeness2/5

    The server lacks write, delete, or policy management tools. For a policy-enforcing tool, there are notable gaps such as file writes or policy listing, which would be expected.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues