Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Fida

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local CLI and MCP server that redacts secrets from logs, files, and diffs before sending them to AI agents, with stable placeholders and token-budgeted truncation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP gateway that reduces context overhead in coding-agent sessions by exposing only relevant tools and enforcing task-appropriate engineering gates, with privacy-first defaults and no network calls until explicitly enabled.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP safety layer that blocks dangerous files and redacts secrets before AI agents can access them, ensuring safe vibe coding.
      4 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that lets AI agents use gated APIs without holding keys, enforcing declarative policies, injecting secrets server-side, and auditing access without content.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first secrets vault for MCP clients that lets AI assistants use secrets by injecting them into child processes, without the plaintext ever entering the model's context.
      5
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: fida_read handles file reads, fida_shell handles command execution. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent pattern: 'fida_' prefix + verb (read, shell). This is a predictable and uniform naming convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is very minimal. While it may cover essential file read and shell execution, it feels thin for a security policy tool that could include more operations.

    Completeness2/5

    The server lacks write, delete, or policy management tools. For a policy-enforcing tool, there are notable gaps such as file writes or policy listing, which would be expected.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues