litreview-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to litreview-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI apps to search real scholarly papers through OpenAlex and retrieve details, abstracts, citation counts, DOIs, open-access links, related papers, and citing papers.11206 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving academic papers, authors, institutions, and citations from the OpenAlex open scholarly index.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables academic research through the OpenAlex API, allowing users to search for papers, authors, and institutions, retrieve citations, and fetch full-text content when available. Perfect for building intelligent research assistants that can explore academic literature and related works.87MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI agents to the OpenAlex scholarly database, enabling search and retrieval of works, authors, institutions, and sources via natural language.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching scholarly literature via the OpenAlex database, with tools for full-text search, work details, citation lookup, and author queries.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving scholarly works, authors, institutions, and citation networks from the OpenAlex catalog via natural language.40 npmISC
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action on the paper domain: retrieval by ID (get_paper), discovery by query (search_papers), citation traversal (get_citations), and open-access resolution (find_open_pdf). Descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other (search_papers says use get_paper for details), eliminating overlap.
All four tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_paper, search_papers, get_citations, find_open_pdf. The verbs are used meaningfully and consistently across the set.
Four tools is lean but fits a focused literature-review server where each tool has a clear role. It is on the thin side of well-scoped, so slightly below the ideal 5-15 range.
The surface covers the core research workflow end to end: search, retrieve details, follow citations forward and backward, and locate open full text. Minor gaps exist around author/venue-level queries and any save/export or batch-lookup capability, which agents would have to work around with repeated searches.