Skip to main content
Glama
litreview-mcp

litreview-mcp

by ajbraus

Related Servers

Alternatives to litreview-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI apps to search real scholarly papers through OpenAlex and retrieve details, abstracts, citation counts, DOIs, open-access links, related papers, and citing papers.
      11
      206 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables academic research through the OpenAlex API, allowing users to search for papers, authors, and institutions, retrieve citations, and fetch full-text content when available. Perfect for building intelligent research assistants that can explore academic literature and related works.
      8
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI agents to the OpenAlex scholarly database, enabling search and retrieval of works, authors, institutions, and sources via natural language.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching scholarly literature via the OpenAlex database, with tools for full-text search, work details, citation lookup, and author queries.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action on the paper domain: retrieval by ID (get_paper), discovery by query (search_papers), citation traversal (get_citations), and open-access resolution (find_open_pdf). Descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other (search_papers says use get_paper for details), eliminating overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_paper, search_papers, get_citations, find_open_pdf. The verbs are used meaningfully and consistently across the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is lean but fits a focused literature-review server where each tool has a clear role. It is on the thin side of well-scoped, so slightly below the ideal 5-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core research workflow end to end: search, retrieve details, follow citations forward and backward, and locate open full text. Minor gaps exist around author/venue-level queries and any save/export or batch-lookup capability, which agents would have to work around with repeated searches.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues