Skip to main content
Glama
aivideocheck

AI Video Check MCP Server

by aivideocheck

Related Servers

Alternatives to AI Video Check MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to generate AI video clips with sound from a text prompt or a photo, poll run status to retrieve the finished video URL, and check remaining account credits. Runs on the user's own Movoa account with an API key.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants in MCP clients to turn long videos from YouTube, VK Video, RuTube, Dzen, Twitch, Yandex Disk, Google Drive or direct links into captioned vertical Shorts/Reels, transcripts and articles, returning links to the finished clips. It also exposes read-only modes and job quoting so clients can inspect sources and estimate credit usage before creating anything.
      19
      81 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to submit Douyin/Bilibili/YouTube links or local audio/video and create reusable processing jobs, then retrieve timestamped transcripts, SRT subtitles, summaries, sampled screenshots, exports, and optional AI-rewritten scripts through MCP tools sharing a local FastAPI job store.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    check_video and check_file both detect AI-generated video and differ only by input source (public link vs local file), which the descriptions make clear but still requires reading carefully. get_check and get_balance have clearly distinct roles (retrieve result vs account status), so overlap is limited to the two check tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four names follow a strict verb_noun snake_case pattern (check_video, check_file, get_check, get_balance). The verbs are used coherently: check_ for initiating analysis, get_ for retrieving information.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a focused detection service: two submission paths, one result retrieval, and one account query. Every tool earns its place with no redundancy or padding.

    Completeness4/5

    The submit/retrieve/balance lifecycle is covered, including both URL and file inputs. Minor gaps exist: no way to list or cancel prior checks, and results expire after 24 hours without a cleanup or history operation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues