A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceThin MCP wrapper over the hosted UploadCheck API to quality check videos, podcasts, and clips before upload.
47 npm
MIT
AI Video Check MCP Server
by aivideocheck
Related Servers
Alternatives to AI Video Check MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
@avclabs.ai/enhance-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables video enhancement through MCP tools for creating tasks, querying status, and synchronous enhancement, supporting URL or local file inputs.342 npmApache 2.0
video-analyzerofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling video analysis via scene detection, audio transcription, visual description, and stylistic fingerprinting, with tools for full pipeline execution and storyboard generation.-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to generate and upscale AI images, videos, music, and sound effects, manage generation jobs, access model catalogs, and track credits.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients like Claude and ChatGPT to generate images and videos, animate images, create lip-synced videos, list TTS voices, and manage media via remote MCP tools.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes video generation and editing tools to MCP-capable clients, enabling text-to-video, image-to-video, video editing, reusable voice and character profiles, and task status queries through natural language.4MIT
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation4/5
check_video and check_file both detect AI-generated video and differ only by input source (public link vs local file), which the descriptions make clear but still requires reading carefully. get_check and get_balance have clearly distinct roles (retrieve result vs account status), so overlap is limited to the two check tools.
Naming Consistency5/5
All four names follow a strict verb_noun snake_case pattern (check_video, check_file, get_check, get_balance). The verbs are used coherently: check_ for initiating analysis, get_ for retrieving information.
Tool Count5/5
Four tools is well-scoped for a focused detection service: two submission paths, one result retrieval, and one account query. Every tool earns its place with no redundancy or padding.
Completeness4/5
The submit/retrieve/balance lifecycle is covered, including both URL and file inputs. Minor gaps exist: no way to list or cancel prior checks, and results expire after 24 hours without a cleanup or history operation.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues