Skip to main content
Glama
aiuxmasters

a11y-mcp-server

by aiuxmasters
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to a11y-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • a11y-mcp

      priyankark
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for performing accessibility audits on webpages using axe-core. Use the results in an agentic loop with your favorite AI assistants (Cline/Cursor/GH Copilot) and let them fix a11y issues for you!
      2
      556 npm
      52
      Mozilla Public 2.0

    • mcp-a11y-tools

      rog0x
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with web accessibility analysis tools via MCP, enabling checks for alt text, heading hierarchy, color contrast, ARIA validation, and form accessibility.
      30 npm
      MIT

    • interface-audit-mcp

      Vinizeira13
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets developers and MCP agents run deterministic local HTML audits, turning inline HTML into structured findings for missing labels, unnamed buttons, skipped headings, ambiguous links, duplicate IDs, and missing landmarks. It also exposes a rule list and returns stable, actionable reports without external API keys.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools are clearly distinguished by input source (HTML string vs file path), but their core functionality is identical, which could cause minor confusion about which to use.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent '_audit_' prefix pattern, making their purpose and variation (input type) predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin for a full accessibility auditing server, though it narrowly covers its stated input methods.

    Completeness2/5

    The server lacks features like rule configuration, output filtering, or detailed reporting, leaving significant gaps for practical usage beyond basic checks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources