Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
CookieGuard AI

CookieGuard AI

by aiscihub
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to CookieGuard AI

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Bannerproof

      Bannerproofofficial

      bannerproof
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to run EU cookie-consent audits on public websites, checking pre-consent trackers, banner rejection behavior, Consent Mode v2, IAB TCF, GPC, undisclosed cookies, and third-party embeds, with findings, evidence, fixes, and legal references.
      MIT

    • Security Hunter MCP

      vikrant-project
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous AI agents and penetration testers to conduct authorized security audits with persistent cross-session memory, zero-trust secret scrubbing, dynamic OWASP/ASVS checklists, and hallucination-free exploit PoC generation from captured traffic.
      1
      MIT

    • web-security-guard

      1nc0gn30
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to audit URLs for security headers, generate CSP Level 3 policies, compute SRI hashes, evaluate WCAG 2.2 contrast, and remediate headers.
      MIT

    • mcp-audit

      saagpatel
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Audits MCP server configurations for security risks including capability inventory, SSRF, prompt injection, and drift detection. Works in read-only mode and can also be used as an MCP server to let AI agents audit their own attack surface.
      259 PyPI
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    cookieguard_scan is explicitly documented as 'Same as cookieguard_audit with url,' so two of five tools perform essentially the same operation, forcing the agent to guess which to pick. The other three (capabilities, explain, policy) are clearly distinct from each other and from the audit tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a strict cookieguard_<verb/noun> snake_case pattern with a uniform server prefix. The suffix conveys intent (audit, scan, explain, policy, capabilities) predictably.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a focused cookie-auditing server: an action, a duplicate action, and three informational/introspection tools. Nothing feels bloated or padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers auditing (URL and evidence file), rule explanation, capability discovery, and policy inspection, which is a coherent read-only lifecycle. Configuration mutation is absent, but that appears intentional since policy is maintainer-fixed; the only real redundancy is the audit/scan duplicate rather than a gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources