Skip to main content
Glama
airsulG

sora-mcp

by airsulG
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to sora-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Fattly

      industriesfatty-spec
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Generate AI images, video, voiceovers and music from Claude, Cursor or VS Code through 50+ models (Veo 3.1, Kling 3, Seedance, Nano Banana, GPT Image, ElevenLabs). Upload photos for edits and image-to-video. Tools are annotated (read-only vs. credit-spending); failed generations are refunded. Local via npx or hosted with OAuth at fattly.app.
      6
      49 npm
      MIT

    • Visual Generator MCP

      baronedog1
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for generating images and videos via external multimodal models, providing unified tools like imageGenerate, videoGenerate, and materialWrite with support for normal and smart generation modes.
      -

    • gpt-image-mcp

      naporin0624
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI-powered image generation using OpenAI's gpt-image-1 and gpt-image-2 models with advanced text rendering and native transparency support.
      43 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of overlap or mis-selection. The single tool's purpose is clearly defined a video generation.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The sole tool uses a clear snake_case verb_noun convention: generate_video. With no other tools there are no conflicting naming patterns to confuse an agent.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool makes the server feel minimal and borderline thin for a video-generation service. However, the tool does encapsulate the full submit/poll/download workflow, so the count is not clearly inadequate.

    Completeness4/5

    The core video generation lifecycle is covered end-to-end within generate_video, including async polling and file saving. Minor gaps exist, such as no separate task-status or cancellation endpoint, but agents can still accomplish the primary use case without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources