Skip to main content
Glama
aiordanescu

ib-gateway-mcp

by aiordanescu

Related Servers

Alternatives to ib-gateway-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to interact with Interactive Brokers' official Web API through a Client Portal Gateway, exposing brokerage account, market data, and trading functionality via authenticated HTTP endpoints.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables users to interact with Interactive Brokers' official Web API through MCP, supporting account management, reporting, and other brokerage operations via the Client Portal Gateway for retail authentication.
      -
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides an interface for the Interactive Brokers API via the ib_async library. It enables users to manage accounts, access real-time and historical market data, and execute or monitor trades through TWS or IB Gateway.
      33
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Interactive Brokers TWS API, enabling automated financial workflows like portfolio rebalancing through 51+ tools for market data, account management, and order execution, plus real-time WebSocket streaming.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Interactive Brokers' official Web API to manage brokerage sessions, retrieve account and market data, and perform trading operations through MCP tools.
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Interactive Brokers via IB Gateway, enabling read access to account data and trading capabilities for paper accounts.
      11
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 50 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, aided by extremely detailed descriptions that cross-reference alternatives (e.g. snapshot vs. streaming, historical vs. real-time). However, several near-pairs such as get_quotes vs. subscribe_quotes, get_historical_bars vs. subscribe_bars, and get_pnl vs. get_position_pnl require careful reading to avoid misselection, and the sheer breadth raises cognitive load.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Names follow a predictable snake_case verb_noun pattern throughout (get_*, subscribe_*, list_*, calculate_*, run_scanner, search_symbols, qualify_contract). The few bare verbs like unsubscribe fit naturally into the subscription-management family, so the set is highly consistent.

    Tool Count2/5

    50 tools is far above the typical well-scoped range of 3–15 and feels heavy even for a broad gateway. While each tool has a discernible function, the granular split between snapshot/stream/historical and diagnostic tools suggests over-decomposition that burdens an agent.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface covers data, accounts, news, scanners, options, and fundamentals well, but it critically lacks any order placement, modification, or cancellation tools. Descriptions repeatedly reference 'order tools' and a trading gate, so the absence of a core trading surface is a significant gap for an IB gateway MCP.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues