Добавить чек-лист

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden for a mutation tool. It says nothing about required permissions, where the checklist is placed among existing checklists, or what the call returns; 'Создаёт' only implies a write, leaving the agent to infer the rest.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler or repetition. It is efficient, though its brevity leaves the surrounding gaps noted in other dimensions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a create/mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is too thin: it does not say what happens on success, whether the checklist ID is returned (needed to then call kaiten_add_checklist_item), or how duplicates are handled.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% — both card_id and name are documented in the schema — so the baseline of 3 applies. The description adds no extra meaning such as ID format, name constraints, or uniqueness behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Создаёт новый чек-лист') and scopes it to a card ('на карточке'), so an agent can tell it creates a checklist container rather than an item or a listing. It does not explicitly contrast with siblings like kaiten_add_checklist_item or kaiten_list_checklists, which keeps it just short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this versus kaiten_add_checklist_item (which adds entries to an existing checklist) or kaiten_list_checklists. No prerequisites, no mention of needing an existing card, and no exclusions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.