Skip to main content
Glama
aimasteracc

tree-sitter-analyzer

by aimasteracc

Related Servers

Alternatives to tree-sitter-analyzer

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Token-efficient code intelligence MCP server that indexes codebases with tree-sitter AST parsing and provides 150 tools for AI agents, using 61-95% fewer tokens than traditional grep/Read workflows.
      946 npm
      4
      Business Source 1.1
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for local-first code intelligence, providing structural code graph, semantic search, and impact analysis to AI agents.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that builds a local code intelligence layer, letting AI agents explore call graphs, blast radius, and source slices via a single tool without external APIs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local repository intelligence MCP server that builds a reusable graph of code structure for AI coding agents, providing 34 network-free tools for understanding, searching, and analyzing repositories without data leaving the machine.
      58 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Ultra-lightweight, local-first MCP server for AI-powered code intelligence, providing AST-based analysis and 20+ tools while ensuring zero data leakage.
      37 npm
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Give your AI coding agents superpowers — a local MCP server for fast, token-efficient code navigation, search & analysis.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The facades have broadly overlapping exploration duties: search, nav, and structure all feel like code-navigation surfaces, and shared action names such as impact, overview, and knowledge appear in multiple tools. An agent would struggle to pick a tool without first querying action=help, since the boundary between facades is not clear from the names or action lists alone.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The eight codegraph facades follow a consistent lowercase single-word naming style (search, nav, structure, health, edit, project, index, viz), which is predictable across the set. The exceptions are the verb-noun set_project_path and the abbreviations nav/viz, which are minor deviations rather than a chaotic mix.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is a well-scoped count for a code-intelligence suite: setup, indexing, searching, navigation, structural analysis, health, editing, project intelligence, and visualization each have a dedicated facade. Each tool bundles many actions but remains a single cohesive entry point, so the count feels intentional rather than excessive or thin.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full expected lifecycle for a code analyzer: project initialization, index management, code search, navigation, AST/structural analysis, health analysis, safe refactoring/editing, project metrics, and visualization. The edit facade even includes verification and mutation-probe actions, and health/test-gap covers quality checking, leaving no obvious dead end or missing major capability.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive