Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to claude-codex-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor to dispatch background subagent jobs to the Antigravity IDE's local agent engine and collect results asynchronously. Jobs run through the IDE's authenticated session without an API key, with optional Gemini REST fallback and on-disk job history.
      6
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects MCP clients such as Claude, Cursor, and VS Code to an OpenCode server's headless API, enabling users to ask questions, delegate and run coding tasks, monitor background jobs, answer prompts and permission requests, and review resulting changes across multiple projects. Sessions accept absolute server-side project directories, support both blocking and asynchronous workflows, and expose persisted job records for recovering or cancelling work.
      24,321 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables delegating tasks to agents you configure yourself through OpenAI-compatible Chat Completions backends, with automatic or explicit routing, synchronous calls, persistent asynchronous jobs, and multi-step reviewed workflows. It returns proposals and analyses only, leaving file changes, command execution, and approvals under the MCP client's control.
      411 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes opencode's coding agent and shell as MCP tools, enabling MCP-only AI clients to execute shell commands, manage files, and run agent sessions with async job handling.
      5 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    codex_task, codex_image, and codex_models target clearly distinct purposes (delegation, image generation, model discovery). The one hazard is codex_job vs codex_jobs, whose near-identical names differ only by number; descriptions do clarify (single-job wait/fetch/cancel vs listing recent jobs), so the overlap is minor rather than fatal.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Every tool shares the predictable `codex_` prefix plus a noun (task, job, image, jobs, models), which reads consistently. The only blemish is the singular/plural pair codex_job/codex_jobs, a small deviation from an otherwise clean scheme.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a Codex-delegation server: one per core action (task, image, job polling, job listing, model listing). Each tool earns its place with no redundancy or padding.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: model discovery before choosing, task/image execution, and job wait/fetch/cancel plus listing for async runs. Cancellation being folded into codex_job rather than a dedicated tool is a minor gap an agent can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues