Skip to main content
Glama
aiguicai

WeCom Mail MCP

by aiguicai

Related Servers

Alternatives to WeCom Mail MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      通过IMAP和SMTP协议实现邮箱读写操作,支持腾讯企业邮箱,可收发邮件、管理文件夹和搜索邮件。
      5
      76 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables sending, listing, and reading email messages via IMAP/POP3 with support for multiple providers, including NetEase, QQ, Gmail, and Outlook.
      7
      2,157 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A mail service that connects private domain email to MCP clients, enabling sending (with auto signature), receiving, and reading emails through natural language via stdio or SSE transport.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables email management for a single mailbox via IMAP and SMTP protocols. Supports reading, searching, and sending emails with threading support through stdio or HTTP transports.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, send, schedule, manage, and analyze email across multiple IMAP/SMTP accounts, including drafts, labels, real-time monitoring, verification-code catching, and calendar extraction. It supports stdio and Streamable HTTP transports, OAuth2, provider auto-detection, and guided setup.
      18 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, send, schedule, and organize messages across multiple IMAP/SMTP accounts, with real-time inbox watching, verification-code capture, calendar extraction, and analytics. It supports provider-aware label management, OAuth2, and both local stdio and networked Streamable HTTP transports.
      18 npm
      ISC

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one sends email, the other retrieves mailbox information. There is no overlap or ambiguity that could lead to misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names use a verb_noun pattern (send_email, get_mailbox_info), which is consistent and predictable. Minor deviation in specificity but acceptable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the set feels thin for an email MCP server. Common operations like listing, reading, or managing emails are absent, making the count borderline inadequate.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only supports sending email and checking mailbox info. Critical lifecycle operations such as reading, replying, forwarding, or managing folders are missing, significantly limiting its usefulness for email workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues