Skip to main content
Glama
aidesignblueprint

AI Design Blueprint Doctrine

Official

handoffs.partnership

Create a partnerships handoff record for design-partner, ecosystem, training, or advisory inquiries. Triggers a human review by the partnerships team.

Instructions

Authenticated — creates a partnerships handoff record for design-partner, ecosystem, training, or advisory conversations needing human review. Persists a PartnershipHandoff row routed to the partnerships inbox; the user is contacted by the team. WHEN TO CALL: user explicitly wants to engage as a design partner, co-marketing/training partner, or evaluate the Blueprint for their org's training programme. ALWAYS confirm with the user before firing — this creates a human-visible partnerships ticket. WHEN NOT TO CALL: for general support / billing / access issues (use handoffs.operator); for paid-engagement enquiries (use handoffs.agency); proactively or as a sales prompt — only when the user has explicitly asked. BEHAVIOR: write-only, single insert, side-effecting (creates a ticket). Auth: Bearer (any plan). UK/EU residency. Response confirms the ticket id + audience so the user can reference it.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
roleNoRole or title of the person submitting the partnership inquiry.
topicNoPartnership topic category.ecosystem
localeNoResponse locale for the handoff acknowledgment.en
reasonYesClear description of the partnership opportunity or inquiry.
websiteNoWebsite of the organization for additional context.
agent_nameNoName of the agent or client triggering the handoff.mcp-client
organizationNoName of the organization or company making the partnership inquiry.
trace_summaryNoOptional agent trace summary for operator context.
agent_platformNoPlatform or runtime the agent is running on.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate write, non-idempotent, open-world. Description adds specific details: write-only, single insert, side-effecting, auth requirements, residency, and response behavior. No contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with labeled sections, front-loaded with core action, and every sentence provides value. Efficient for the complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, usage, behavior, auth, and response. Lacks error handling details but schema covers parameters. Sufficient for a handoff tool with clear sibling context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptive parameter names and descriptions. The description does not add extra parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a partnerships handoff record for specific conversation types (design-partner, ecosystem, training, advisory). It distinguishes from sibling tools by naming handoffs.operator and handoffs.agency for other purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit WHEN TO CALL and WHEN NOT TO CALL sections provide clear guidance on appropriate contexts, including examples and alternatives. Also instructs to confirm with user before firing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aidesignblueprint/integrations'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server