Skip to main content
Glama
aidesignblueprint

AI Design Blueprint Doctrine

Official

handoffs.partnership

Creates a partnership inquiry ticket for design-partner, ecosystem, training, or advisory opportunities, routed to the human team for review and contact.

Instructions

Authenticated — creates a partnerships handoff record for design-partner, ecosystem, training, or advisory conversations needing human review. Persists a PartnershipHandoff row routed to the partnerships inbox; the user is contacted by the team. WHEN TO CALL: user explicitly wants to engage as a design partner, co-marketing/training partner, or evaluate the Blueprint for their org's training programme. ALWAYS confirm with the user before firing — this creates a human-visible partnerships ticket. WHEN NOT TO CALL: for general support / billing / access issues (use handoffs.operator); for paid-engagement enquiries (use handoffs.agency); proactively or as a sales prompt — only when the user has explicitly asked. BEHAVIOR: write-only, single insert, side-effecting (creates a ticket). Auth: Bearer (any plan). UK/EU residency. Response confirms the ticket id + audience so the user can reference it.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
roleNoRole or title of the person submitting the partnership inquiry.
topicNoPartnership topic category.ecosystem
localeNoResponse locale for the handoff acknowledgment.en
reasonYesClear description of the partnership opportunity or inquiry.
websiteNoWebsite of the organization for additional context.
agent_nameNoName of the agent or client triggering the handoff.mcp-client
organizationNoName of the organization or company making the partnership inquiry.
trace_summaryNoOptional agent trace summary for operator context.
agent_platformNoPlatform or runtime the agent is running on.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false) are consistent. Description adds: write-only, single insert, side-effecting, auth requirement (Bearer token), UK/EU residency, and response includes ticket id+audience.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-organized with clear sections: purpose, when to call/not call, behavior. Every sentence adds value, no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 9 parameters (1 required) and annotations, description covers purpose, usage, behavioral traits, auth, locale, and response. Output schema exists but description mentions response shape. Complete for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% description coverage, so baseline is 3. Description does not add new parameter-level meaning beyond what schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a partnerships handoff record for design-partner, ecosystem, training, or advisory conversations. It distinguishes from sibling tools (handoffs.operator, handoffs.agency) by specifying use case.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit when-to-call: user explicitly wants to engage as a design partner, co-marketing/training partner, or evaluate Blueprint. When-not-to-call: for general support/billing/access (use handoffs.operator), paid-engagement (use handoffs.agency), or as a sales prompt. Includes confirmation instruction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aidesignblueprint/integrations'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server