No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct phase or concern: liveness, discovery Q&A, spec chunk retrieval/review, plan generation/approval, execution, task reset, status, and project listing. Pairings like make_plan/approve_plan and next_spec_chunk/review_spec_chunk are sequential rather than overlapping, and the descriptions reinforce their roles.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (start_project, submit_answers, approve_plan, reset_task, list_projects), but health, status, run, and next_spec_chunk deviate by using bare nouns, a bare verb, or a noun-phrase without an action verb. The overall style is still readable and mostly predictable.
11 tools fit the server's staged workflow—discovery, spec, plan, execute, and observe—and each serves a clear purpose. There is no obvious bloat; even the health and list_projects tools are reasonable utility surfaces.
The core lifecycle is well covered: start_project, submit_answers, next_spec_chunk, review_spec_chunk, make_plan, approve_plan, run, reset_task, and status form a coherent path with no dead ends. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit cancel/stop for a running execution or a revision path for an already-approved plan/spec, but these can likely be worked around.
