Skip to main content
Glama
ai-yliu

Filesystem MCP Server

by ai-yliu
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Filesystem MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Claude Local Bridge

      suhteevah
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure MCP server that allows Claude to read and write local files on your machine with explicit approval gating for each access.
      MIT

    • MCP Claude Code

      SDGLBL
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that implements Claude Code-like functionality, allowing the AI to analyze codebases, modify files, execute commands, and manage projects through direct file system interactions.
      15
      304
      MIT

    • file-system-mcp-server

      calebmwelsh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for file system operations, providing Claude and other AI assistants with access to local files and directories.
      2
      MIT

    • FilesystemMCP

      RijadAlisic
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local, customizable MCP server for filesystem access that extends the official Anthropic implementation with additional tools and functionality. It enables users to securely read, write, edit, and manage files and directories within specific allowed local paths.
      647,066 npm
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. For example, list_directory shows contents, list_allowed_directories shows accessible paths, and read_file vs read_multiple_files handle single vs batch operations. The descriptions clearly differentiate overlapping concepts like searching vs listing.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and readable, with clear action-object pairs like create_directory, move_file, and search_files. There are no deviations in style or convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the count is well-scoped for a filesystem server, covering essential operations without bloat. Each tool earns its place, from basic CRUD (create, read, write) to advanced utilities like search and batch reads, making it comprehensive yet manageable.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset provides complete coverage for filesystem operations, including CRUD (create, read, write, move/delete via move_file), metadata access, listing, searching, and batch processing. There are no obvious gaps, and agents can handle typical workflows without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources